Dein Suchergebnis zum Thema: Förster

The quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedure is an element of the QA/QC programme of the Union system for policies and measures and projections to be established in 2015 according to Article 12 of the MMR. The European Environment Agency (EEA) is responsible for the annual implementation of the QA/QC procedures and is assisted by the European Topic Centre for air pollution and climate change mitigation (ETC/ACM). The QA/QC procedure document describes QA/QC checks carried out at EU level on the national reported projections from Member States and on the compiled Union GHG projections. QA/QC procedures are performed at several different stages during the preparation of the national and Union GHG projections in order to aim to ensure the timeliness, transparency, accuracy, consistency, comparability and completeness of the reported information.
Hannah Förster Gruppenleiterin Mitigation & Ökonomie

Hannah Förster vom Öko-Institut derzeit die Bundesregierung

This case study is part of a series of six studies which show good practice examples for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the sectors covered under the Effort Sharing Legislation. It has been developed on behalf of the European Commission, DG Climate Action. The CO2 tax is a carbon pricing instrument introduced to Switzerland in 2008. The tax covers approximately 35 % of all CO2emissions in Switzerland and applies primarily to the use of thermal fuels. The tax is not levied onto motor fuels, companies (and their installations) participating in the Swiss Emission Trading Scheme (CH ETS) and exemptions are available to other companies. Significant emission reductions can be attributed to the CO2 tax in Switzerland and lessons from the development and implementation of the instrument can be applied to other national contexts. The case study provides an overview of the CO2 tax, including the key actors involved, primary objectives, and how it interacts with other schemes. The study then focuses on the implementation of the CO2 tax and finally offers an assessment of the tax. This examines both the successes and the limitations of the CO2 tax and considers its future potentials.
Hannah Förster Gruppenleiterin Mitigation & Ökonomie

Heterogeneous data, different definitions and incompatible models are a huge problem in many domains, with no exception for the field of energy systems analysis. Hence, it is hard to re-use results, compare model results or couple models at all. Ontologies provide a precisely defined vocabulary to build a common and shared conceptualisation of the energy domain. Here, we present the Open Energy Ontology (OEO) developed for the domain of energy systems analysis. Using the OEO provides several benefits for the community. First, it enables consistent annotation of large amounts of data from various research projects. One example is the Open Energy Platform (OEP). Adding such annotations makes data semantically searchable, exchangeable, re-usable and interoperable. Second, computational model coupling becomes much easier. The advantages of using an ontology such as the OEO are demonstrated with three use cases: data representation, data annotation and interface homogenisation. We also describe how the ontology can be used for linked open data (LOD). Published in: Energy and AI, 2021, 100074, ISSN 2666-5468
Hannah Förster Gruppenleiterin Mitigation & Ökonomie

In der aktuellen eco@work beschäftigen wir uns ausführlich mit natürlichen Kohlenstoffsen-ken, ihren Potenzialen aber auch jenen Faktoren, die sie gefährden.
Hannah Förster vom Öko-Institut derzeit die Bundesregierung

Untersucht wurden die Treibhausgasemissionen für Deutschland auf der Basis von Modellanalysen für im Detail spezifizierte energie- und klimapolitische Instrumente. Im Mit-Maßnahmen-Szenario (MMS) werden alle Maßnahmen berücksichtigt, die bis zum 31.08.2014 ergriffen worden sind. Im Mit-Weiteren-Maßnahmen-Szenario (MWMS) kommen die im Aktionsprogramm Klimaschutz 2020 und im Nationalen Aktionsplan Energieeffizienz im Dezember 2014 zusätzlich von der Bundesregierung beschlossenen Maßnahmen hinzu. Im Vergleich zum Basisjahr 1990 wird bis 2020 eine Emissionsminderung für die vom Kyoto-Protokoll erfassten Treibhausgase von 32,7 % (MMS) bzw. 37,4 % (MWMS) erreicht, bis 2030 sind es 43 bzw. 49 %. Der vorliegende Bericht entspricht inhaltlich im Wesentlichen dem Projektionsbericht der Bundesregierung 2015.
Hannah Förster Gruppenleiterin Mitigation & Ökonomie

Hannah Förster Gruppenleiterin Mitigation & Ökonomie

Gemäß Artikel 18 der Verordnung (EU) 2018/1999 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. De-zember 2018 über das Governance-System für die Energieunion und für den Klimaschutz, zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 663/2009 und (EG) Nr. 715/2009 Der deutsche Projektionsbericht 2023 beschreibt die projizierte Entwicklung der Treibhausgasemissionen in Deutschland in einem Mit-Maßnahmen-⁠Szenario⁠ (MMS) sowie in einem Mit-Weiteren-Maßnahmen-Szenario (MWMS) für die Jahre 2023 bis 2050. Die Darstellung der Ergebnisse erfolgt gemäß dem Zuschnitt der Sektoren des Bundes-Klimaschutzgesetzes 2021 (Energiewirtschaft, Industrie, Gebäude, Verkehr, Landwirtschaft, ⁠Landnutzung⁠, ⁠LULUCF⁠ sowie Abfallwirtschaft und Sonstiges) sowie gemäß der Unterteilung in Emissionen unter der europäischen Lastenteilungsverordnung (ESR) und dem europäischen Zertifikathandel (EU-ETS 1). Das Ziel der Netto-Treibhausgasneutralität bis 2045 wird in beiden Szenarien nicht erreicht. Die Gesamtlücke zu den Zielen bis zum Jahr 2030 beträgt 331 Mio. t CO2-Äquivalente (MMS) und 194 Mio. t CO2-Äquivalente (MWMS).
Hannah Förster Gruppenleiterin Mitigation & Ökonomie

In 2009, the European Union (EU) pledged a unilateral greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target of 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, rising to 30 percent if “other developed countries commit themselves to comparable emission reductions” (European Council 2009). The EU’s GHG target forms one pillar of a so-called 20-20-20 package that, in addition to the 20 percent GHG reduction, demands a 20 percent share of renewable energy sources in gross final energy consumption along with a 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency by 2020. In addition to its 2020 targets, the EU has also set a long-term GHG reduction goal of 80 to 95 percent from 1990 levels by 2050. In the context of these goals, this report provides a summary of existing and emerging EU policies that are likely to reduce GHG emissions across the EU. Our analysis focuses on policies that are mandatory or provide a financial incentive, such as the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) – a cornerstone of EU climate policy – the Renewable Energy Directive, and the Biofuels Directive. We discuss the relationship of these policies to the EU’s GHG and energy targets, and identify key issues to watch in the EU’s evolving policy landscape. This report draws on projections from the “Energy Roadmap 2050” to assess whether the EU is on track to reach its GHG, renewable energy and energy efficiency targets. We find that the EU is on track to surpass its 2020 GHG reduction and renewable energy targets based on current policies, but that additional measures will be required to meet the 2020 energy efficiency target and the 2050 GHG reduction goal.
Hannah Förster Gruppenleiterin Mitigation & Ökonomie

Hannah Förster Gruppenleiterin Mitigation & Ökonomie